і
(d)
Aliens & natinali
person may be deporter alli
Jursing
inquiry
the continuance of a Proclamation
under the
Peace
Preservation codes
1886.
(5.5.)
(e).
Under Bill the
the new
Time
British
Ze
I should have.
per
clames of subjects with
deportable apparents
without any
Q
enquing
personal exa!
-mination G
unanurious
a
restation
The Ex. Council
7/2
Thought
that
Some sort of formal procedure
ought Vote
lash case
Mi
n is perhaps unnecessary to trouble to. with these
Cut
subject to point,
we might F.o. mas say
? hat their V.
C
Jagree 14
First get F.0. views t and then put Mr.
Tennyson's points to the Gov. I agree with him
159
in thinking that in any case there ought to be
some sort of formal procedure, and it also seems
to me objectionable that action should be depen-·
dent on an unanimous resolution of the Ex. C.
Apart from the possibility that any single
member of the Council (which includes two unof-
ficial members might embarrass the Govt. there
seems to me a constitutional objection to in-
vesting the members of the Ex.
f.
with any
personal power. They are there to advise the
Gov. He has to consult them before issuing Or-
ders in Council, but he need not follow their
advice though if he acts in a way contrary to
the advice of the majority he has to report to
the S. of S. The present proposal under which
he could only issue an order of Deportation
on a vote of the Council in which every member
has the same deciding power as himself seens
inadmissible.
13
4.9.
As to the policy of taking power to banish these
classes of British subjects I defer minuting till
What
we have F.0. views.
Consult 8.0.
Ave
alom hd.
3.9.13
the gov CO. 307870
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.